Solr EDisMax Query Parser Guide
Combining the best of DisMax and Extended DisMax with a dash of humor and a nod to traditional Solr wisdom.
Introduction
Solr’s EDisMax (Extended DisMax) query parser is the workhorse for modern search applications. It builds upon the classic DisMax parser, providing more flexibility, advanced features, and sharper control over scoring. In the days of yore, we manually crafted complex Solr queries with multiple TF-IDF tweaks; today, EDisMax handles much of that complexity, letting you focus on practical relevance tuning (and perhaps nostalgically remember those heady days of manual schema edits).
This guide dives deep into EDisMax’s most important parameters:
qfmmpf,pf1,pf2ps,ps1,ps2
We’ll cover:
- Parameter Overviews: What each parameter does.
- Practical Schema Definitions: Example
schema.xmlconfigurations. - Query Examples: How to call EDisMax in practice.
- Detailed Explanations: Behind-the-scenes of scoring and slop.
- Keeping
qClean: Usingqfto avoid polluting your query string.
1. EDisMax Parameter Overviews
1.1 qf (Query Fields)
- Purpose: Defines which fields EDisMax searches and at what boost weights.
- Why It Matters: Separates “What the user typed” (
q) from Solr-specific logic (boosts). Keep yourqas pure user intent.
Syntax:
qf=field1^boost1 field2^boost2 ...
field1,field2: field names defined inschema.xml.boost(float): relative weight for that field.
Example:
qf=title^2.0 description^1.0 content^0.5
1.2 mm (Minimum “Should” Match)
- Purpose: Controls how many terms in a multi-term query must match in the targeted fields.
- Why It Matters: Balances recall vs. precision. Too strict (
mm=100%) → few/no results; too loose (mm=0%) → noisy results.
Syntax:
mm=<value>
- Absolute:
mm=2(at least 2 terms must match) - Relative:
mm=75%(75% of terms must match) - Combined: Supports “N of M” logic:
mm=2<90% 5<100%
Example:
mm=2<75% 4<90% 6<100%
Interpretation: For queries up to 2 terms, require 75% (i.e., both terms). For up to 4, require 75%. For up to 6, require 90%. For more than 6, require 100%.
1.3 pf, pf1, pf2 (Phrase Fields)
EDisMax can detect phrase matches (adjacent tokens) and boost documents accordingly.
-
pf- Purpose: Apply a boost when the entire (multi-term) query appears as a contiguous phrase in the field.
- Syntax:
pf=fieldA^boostA fieldB^boostB ... - Usage: Best for multi-word queries (3+ terms). Combined with
ps.
-
pf2- Purpose: Boost when any two-term phrase (bigram) from the query matches contiguously.
- Syntax:
pf2=fieldA^boostA fieldB^boostB ... - Usage: Useful to capture important two-word phrases even if the full phrase fails.
-
pf1- Purpose: Boost when a single-term query appears (helpful for one-word queries to maintain consistency).
- Syntax:
pf1=fieldA^boostA fieldB^boostB ... - Usage: For single-word queries; can mimic
qfbehavior but reserved for phrase logic.
1.4 ps, ps1, ps2 (Phrase Slops)
Phrase slop determines how far apart terms can be and still count as a phrase.
-
ps- Slop for
pffields. - Syntax:
ps=<integer> - Example:
ps=2allows up to two token moves (e.g., “quick fox” matching “quick brown fox”).
- Slop for
-
ps2- Slop for
pf2(two-term phrases). - Syntax:
ps2=<integer> - Example:
ps2=1— if query is “solar power”, it will still match “power of solar” if only one word moves.
- Slop for
-
ps1- Slop for
pf1(single-term). - Syntax:
ps1=<integer>(though slop rarely matters for single-term). - Example: Use
ps1=0(exact match) or omit.
- Slop for
2. Practical schema.xml Definitions
Below is an example schema.xml snippet illustrating how to set up fields commonly used with EDisMax. In this fictional “ClassicBook” index, we have fields for title, author, summary, and content.
<!-- schema.xml excerpt for EDisMax example --> <schema name="classicbook" version="1.6"> <!-- Field Types --> <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100"> <analyzer type="index"> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> <filter class="solr.PorterStemFilterFactory"/> </analyzer> <analyzer type="query"> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> <filter class="solr.PorterStemFilterFactory"/> </analyzer> </fieldType> <!-- Fields --> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" required="true"/> <field name="title" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="false"/> <field name="author" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"/> <field name="summary" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="false"/> <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="false" multiValued="false"/> <!-- Copy Field: Aggregate searchable text --> <field name="text_all" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="false" multiValued="false"/> <copyField source="title" dest="text_all"/> <copyField source="author" dest="text_all"/> <copyField source="summary" dest="text_all"/> <copyField source="content" dest="text_all"/> <!-- Default Search Field --> <defaultSearchField>text_all</defaultSearchField> <!-- Unique Key --> <uniqueKey>id</uniqueKey> </schema>
Notes on Fields:
text_all: Combined field with all searchable content. Usetext_allinqf,pf, etc.- Field-Specific Boosting: We will boost
titlemore thancontentbecause titles historically matter more to users.
3. Keeping q Clean with qf
A traditional Solr query might look like:
http://localhost:8983/solr/classicbook/select?q=title:"solar power"^2 summary:"solar power"^1
But that pollutes q with boost logic. Instead, use:
q: raw user text, e.g.:solar powerqf: field boostsbq,bf: additional boosts (optionally)
Example (clean q):
q=solar power &defType=edismax &qf=title^3.0 summary^1.5 text_all^0.5
- Explanation:
titlematches count triple weight.summarydouble weight.text_allkeeps the engine honest but low weight.
Your query string remains user-centric.
4. EDisMax in Action: Query Examples
Below are several search examples illustrating how EDisMax parameters affect results.
4.1 Basic Keyword Search with qf and mm
Request:
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=ancient philosophy &defType=edismax &qf=title^2 summary^1 content^0.2 &mm=75% &hl=true
What Happens:
- Tokenization: “ancient” and “philosophy”
mm=75%:- For 2 terms, 75% rounds up → both terms must match (since 75% of 2 = 1.5 → 2 terms).
- Field Scoring:
- Matches in
titlecount double compared tosummary. - Matches in
contentcount minimal.
- Matches in
If a document has “ancient” in title but not “philosophy,” it is excluded (because both must match). Solr returns documents where both words appear, boosting those with title matches.
4.2 Phrase Boosting with pf and ps
Request:
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=ancient philosophy treatise &defType=edismax &qf=title^2 summary^1 content^0.2 &mm=2<75% 3<90% 4<100% &pf=title^5 summary^3 &ps=2
What Happens:
-
Term Matching:
mm=2<75%: For 3 terms, need at least 75% → 3 terms * 0.75 = 2.25 → 3 terms.- For 4 terms, need 90%.
- Effect: Strict multi-term matching.
-
Phrase Boost (
pf):- If “ancient philosophy treatise” appears [with up to 2-word gaps (
ps=2)] intitleorsummary, a significant boost is applied. - E.g., “ancient philosophical treatise” (one word in between) still qualifies.
- If “ancient philosophy treatise” appears [with up to 2-word gaps (
-
Scoring Order:
- Exact phrase in
title> phrase insummary> term matches alone.
- Exact phrase in
4.3 Two-Term Phrase with pf2 and ps2
Suppose we want to capture strong two-word phrases:
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=quantum mechanics equations &defType=edismax &qf=title^2 summary^1 content^0.2 &mm=2<75% 3<90% 4<100% &pf2=title^4 summary^2 &ps2=1
What Happens:
- For any two-term phrase from “quantum mechanics equations” (e.g., “quantum mechanics”, “mechanics equations”):
- If “quantum mechanics” appears with slop ≤ 1 in
title, boost by 4. - In
summary, boost by 2.
- If “quantum mechanics” appears with slop ≤ 1 in
Thus, even if the full three-term phrase isn’t present, two-term pairs can surface important context.
4.4 One-Term Phrase with pf1 and ps1
For completeness:
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=philosophy &defType=edismax &qf=title^2 summary^1 content^0.2 &mm=1 &pf1=title^3 summary^1 &ps1=0
- Single-term query “philosophy.”
pf1boosts documents where “philosophy” appears intitle(×3) orsummary(×1).ps1=0means exact match; no slop needed.
5. Deep Dive into Parameters
5.1 qf: The Heart of Clean Queries
<!-- In solrconfig.xml (RequestHandler) --> <requestHandler name="/select" class="solr.SearchHandler" default="true"> <lst name="defaults"> <str name="defType">edismax</str> <str name="qf"> title^3.0 summary^1.5 text_all^0.5 </str> <str name="mm">2<75% 4<90% 6<100%</str> <str name="pf">title^4 summary^2</str> <str name="ps">2</str> <str name="pf2">title^3 summary^1</str> <str name="ps2">1</str> <str name="pf1">title^2 summary^1</str> <str name="ps1">0</str> </lst> </requestHandler>
-
Why Defaults?
Embedding yourqfandmmin defaults ensures consistency across all calls. You can override at query time if needed. -
Traditional Tip:
“Once you set sensible default boosts, you save yourself countless hours of tweaking individual requests.”
5.2 mm: Balancing Recall vs. Precision
-
Absolute vs. Percentage:
- Use absolute (
mm=2) for short queries (2–3 words). - Use relative (
mm=50%) for longer queries.
- Use absolute (
-
Composite Syntax:
mm=2<75% 4<90% 6<100%:- Up to 2 terms → 75% → 2 terms must match.
- 3–4 terms → at least 3 matches.
- 5–6 terms → at least 5 matches.
- 7+ terms → 100% matches (strict).
Pro Tip (Traditional Wisdom): If you haven’t set
mmand rely on default fuzzy matching, you might end up with the dreaded “too many results” syndrome.
5.3 pf, pf1, pf2: Phrase Boosting Strategies
-
Why Phrase Boost?
Users often type queries that imply an exact phrase (“sherlock holmes stories”). Reward documents that honor the phrase. It’s like giving a tip to the bartender for a well-made drink—acknowledge exactly what was asked. -
pf(General Phrase Boost):- Targets the entire query sequence.
- Combined with
psto allow “wiggle room” (slop).
-
pf2(Bigram Boost):- Useful when the full phrase fails or user typed a longer phrase.
- Captures strong two-word signals.
-
pf1(Unigram Boost):- Useful for consistency in single-word queries.
- Ensures short queries also benefit from phrase logic.
-
Fine-Tuning Slop (
ps,ps2,ps1):ps=2: Up to 2-term gaps in phrase.ps2=1: Up to 1-term gap in bigrams.ps1=0: No gap for single-term (exact).
5.4 Putting It All Together: Sample solrconfig.xml
<config> <requestHandler name="/select" class="solr.SearchHandler"> <lst name="defaults"> <str name="defType">edismax</str> <!-- Core Query Fields --> <str name="qf"> title^3.0 summary^1.5 text_all^0.5 </str> <!-- Minimum “Should” Match --> <str name="mm">2<75% 4<90% 6<100%</str> <!-- Phrase Boosts --> <str name="pf">title^5 summary^3</str> <str name="ps">2</str> <str name="pf2">title^4 summary^2</str> <str name="ps2">1</str> <str name="pf1">title^3 summary^1</str> <str name="ps1">0</str> <!-- Highlighting Defaults --> <str name="hl">true</str> <str name="hl.fl">title,summary,content</str> </lst> </requestHandler> </config>
Explanation:
qf: Splits search across fields, boostingtitlemost.mm: Balances how many terms must match.pf: Big phrase boost to reward exact (or near-exact) matches.pf2: Two-word phrase boost, capturing key bigrams.pf1: Single-term phrase boost, ensuring one-word queries still get a leg up.ps,ps2,ps1: Slop controls—allowing some wiggle but not too much.
6. Advanced Examples & Scenarios
6.1 Long Queries with pf2 and pf
Scenario:
A user queries: “quantum field theory experiments at low temperatures”.
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=quantum field theory experiments at low temperatures &defType=edismax &qf=title^2 summary^1 text_all^0.3 &mm=4<75% 7<90% 10<100% &pf=title^5 summary^3 &ps=2 &pf2=title^4 summary^2 &ps2=1
- Term Count: 7 terms.
mm: of 7 terms, require 90% → 7 × 0.9 = 6.3 → 7 terms. (Strict)- Phrase Logic:
- If “quantum field theory experiments” appears (with ≤ 2-term slop) in
title, massive boost. - Even if that fails, any two-word pairs like “quantum field” or “field theory” get a smaller boost.
- If “quantum field theory experiments” appears (with ≤ 2-term slop) in
Vintage Wisdom: Back in the day, we hand-crafted this logic with multiple
qclauses. Now, EDisMax elegantly bundles it.
6.2 Query-Time Overrides
Though defaults serve most cases, you can override parameters on the fly:
GET /solr/classicbook/select? q=renaissance art paintings &defType=edismax &qf=title^4 summary^2 text_all^0.4 &pf=title^6 summary^3 &ps=3 &mm=2<80% 5<90% 8<100% &rows=20 &sort=score desc, publish_date desc
- Query-Specific Boosts: Bump
titlefurther for “art”-centric queries. - Phrase Slop: Increased to
3to allow permutations like “art of renaissance paintings”. - Sorting: Traditional “score then date” ordering.
7. Best Practices and Traditional Tips
-
Set Sensible Defaults:
- Tune
qfandmmin yoursolrconfig.xmldefaults. Overrides are the exception, not the rule.
- Tune
-
Phrase Boosting Wisdom:
- Start with
pf+ps=2. See if that yields decent results. Addpf2if long queries are common. - Resist the urge to crank
pstoo high—phrase logic gets too loose.
- Start with
-
Keep
qPure:- Always let
qbe user-provided text. Place boosting/logic in separate parameters likeqf,bq,bf.
- Always let
-
Iterate with Analytics:
- Review Solr’s query logs. Are users often getting no results? Adjust
mm. - Are phrase matches failing? Tweak
psor addpf2.
- Review Solr’s query logs. Are users often getting no results? Adjust
-
Legacy Reminder:
- If you remember basic Lucene queries (
+title:(ancient philosophy) +summary:(ancient philosophy)), EDisMax is your elegant shortcut. Honor the old ways by acknowledging them, but embrace convenience.
- If you remember basic Lucene queries (
8. Summary
EDisMax streamlines complex boolean and phrase-scoring logic into a cohesive, user-friendly API. By mastering:
qf: Keep your query field mappings clear and boost weights sensible.mm: Balance recall and precision with thoughtful minimum-match.pf,pf1,pf2,ps,ps1,ps2: Elevate phrase relevance without over-engineering.
…you retain the “traditional Solr craftsmanship” while leveraging modern conveniences. May your search results be ever relevant, your phrase boosts well-balanced, and your schema forever flexible.
Written with respect for the traditions of Solr and a wink to the days of manual Lucene queries. Enjoy!

